Chevrolet Evanda 2005 vs Ford Mondeo 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 131 HP | 145 HP | |
| Torque: | 181 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Ford Mondeo is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Evanda engine produces 14 HP less power than Ford Mondeo, whereas torque is 9 NM less than Ford Mondeo. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Evanda reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 | 8.0 | |
|
The Ford Mondeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Evanda consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Evanda could require 240 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| Ford Mondeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.43 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Evanda is 4 cm longer than the Ford Mondeo, 1 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Evanda is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 500 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Evanda is 0.7 metres less than that of the Ford Mondeo, which means Chevrolet Evanda can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`865 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Evanda has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |