Chevrolet Evanda 2005 vs Skoda Superb 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 131 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 181 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Skoda Superb is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Evanda engine produces 19 HP less power than Skoda Superb, whereas torque is 29 NM less than Skoda Superb. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Evanda reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 | 8.3 | |
|
The Skoda Superb is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Evanda consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Evanda could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| Skoda Superb gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Skoda Superb 2002 1.8 engine: The weakest link in this engine is the turbine, whose failure is contributed to by a faulty catalytic converter. The oil pump and chain tensioner also tend to have problems. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.47 m | |
| Chevrolet Evanda is 3 cm shorter than the Skoda Superb, 6 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Evanda is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Evanda is 1.4 metres less than that of the Skoda Superb, which means Chevrolet Evanda can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Evanda has
|
Skoda Superb has
| |