Chevrolet Evanda 2005 vs Ford Mondeo 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 (petrol) | 1.8 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Ford Mondeo is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 131 HP | 90 - 226 HP | |
| Torque: | 181 NM | 165 - 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 - 12.5 seconds | 7.4 - 12.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 - 9.6 | 5.7 - 10.7 | |
|
Chevrolet Evanda petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Mondeo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.43 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Evanda is 4 cm longer than the Ford Mondeo, 1 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Evanda is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 500 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Evanda is 0.7 metres less than that of the Ford Mondeo, which means Chevrolet Evanda can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`500 | ~ 1`949 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Evanda has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |