Chevrolet Evanda 2005 vs Mazda 3 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 (petrol) | 1.3 - 2.3 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 131 HP | 84 - 260 HP | |
| Torque: | 181 NM | 122 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 - 12.5 seconds | 6.1 - 14.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 - 9.6 | 4.7 - 9.7 | |
|
Chevrolet Evanda petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Chevrolet Evanda is larger, but slightly lower. Chevrolet Evanda is 28 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 6 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Evanda is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 413 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1285 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Evanda is 0.5 metres less than that of the Mazda 3, which means Chevrolet Evanda can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`500 | ~ 1`796 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Evanda has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |