Chevrolet Equinox 2017 vs BMW X5 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 139 HP | 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 325 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.5 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Equinox engine produces 92 HP less power than BMW X5, whereas torque is 125 NM less than BMW X5. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 80 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 2 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on BMW 5 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X5 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 4.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Chevrolet Equinox is smaller. Chevrolet Equinox is 27 cm shorter than the BMW X5, 16 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Equinox is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 847 litres | 650 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1798 litres | 1870 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Chevrolet Equinox has 197 litres more trunk space than the BMW X5. The BMW X5 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X5 (by 72 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Equinox is 1.2 metres less than that of the BMW X5, which means Chevrolet Equinox can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`820 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 53 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Equinox has
|
BMW X5 has
| |