Chevrolet Equinox 2017 vs Renault Koleos 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 256 HP | 144 HP | |
| Torque: | 353 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Equinox engine produces 112 HP more power than Renault Koleos, whereas torque is 153 NM more than Renault Koleos. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 7.5 | |
|
The Renault Koleos is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Equinox consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Koleos, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Equinox could require 240 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| Renault Koleos gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chevrolet Camaro, Chevrolet Malibu, Chevrolet Traverse | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chevrolet Equinox might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.67 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Equinox is 2 cm shorter than the Renault Koleos, width is practically the same , while the height of Chevrolet Equinox is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 847 litres | 538 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1798 litres | 1690 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Equinox has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Chevrolet Equinox has 309 litres more trunk space than the Renault Koleos. The Renault Koleos may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Equinox (by 108 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`140 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 18 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Equinox has
|
Renault Koleos has
| |