Chevrolet Equinox 2017 vs Toyota Camry 2006
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 256 HP | 167 HP | |
| Torque: | 353 NM | 224 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Equinox engine produces 89 HP more power than Toyota Camry, whereas torque is 129 NM more than Toyota Camry. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 | 9.9 | |
| Chevrolet Equinox consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Camry, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Equinox over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 660 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Camry gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chevrolet Camaro, Chevrolet Malibu, Chevrolet Traverse | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota RAV4, Toyota Previa | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Toyota Camry 2006 2.4 engine: A fairly robust engine, easy to maintain and spare parts are readily available. Not too sensitive to fuel quality. High oil consumption and relatively short chain life (around 170 000 km). | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.46 m | |
| Chevrolet Equinox is 16 cm shorter than the Toyota Camry, 2 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Equinox is 20 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 846 litres | 535 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1798 litres | no data | |
|
Chevrolet Equinox has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Chevrolet Equinox has 311 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Camry. The Toyota Camry may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Equinox is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota Camry, which means Chevrolet Equinox can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`985 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Equinox has
|
Toyota Camry has
| |