Chevrolet Equinox 2017 vs BMW 5 series 2000
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 139 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 325 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Equinox engine produces 3 HP more power than BMW 5 series, whereas torque is 45 NM more than BMW 5 series. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 5.9 | |
|
The BMW 5 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Equinox consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Equinox could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 1180 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 1480 km on highway | ||
| BMW 5 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a BMW 5 series engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 2 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on BMW 3 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW 5 series might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.44 m | |
| Chevrolet Equinox is 13 cm shorter than the BMW 5 series, 4 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Equinox is 22 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 846 litres | 460 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1798 litres | no data | |
|
Chevrolet Equinox has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The BMW 5 series may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Equinox is 0.4 metres more than that of the BMW 5 series, which means Chevrolet Equinox can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`000 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Equinox has
|
BMW 5 sērija has
| |