Chevrolet Equinox 2017 vs Mini Countryman 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 139 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 325 NM | 330 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Equinox engine produces 11 HP less power than Mini Countryman, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Mini Countryman. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 5.1 | |
|
The Mini Countryman is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Equinox consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mini Countryman, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Equinox could require 255 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
| Mini Countryman gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.56 m | |
|
Chevrolet Equinox is larger. Chevrolet Equinox is 35 cm longer than the Mini Countryman, 2 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Equinox is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 846 litres | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1798 litres | 1390 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Equinox has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Equinox has 396 litres more trunk space than the Mini Countryman. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Equinox (by 408 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 22 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Equinox has
|
Mini Countryman has
| |