Chevrolet Equinox 2009 vs Ford Explorer 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 301 HP | 212 HP | |
| Torque: | 369 NM | 344 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Equinox is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Equinox engine produces 89 HP more power than Ford Explorer, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Ford Explorer. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Equinox reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.4 | 13.0 | |
| Chevrolet Equinox consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Explorer, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Equinox over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 85 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| Ford Explorer gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.81 m | |
| Chevrolet Equinox is 4 cm shorter than the Ford Explorer, 1 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Equinox is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 889 litres | 391 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Equinox has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Chevrolet Equinox has 498 litres more trunk space than the Ford Explorer. The Ford Explorer may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`404 | 2`595 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Equinox has
|
Ford Explorer has
| |