Chevrolet Equinox 2009 vs Toyota Highlander 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 301 HP | 273 HP | |
| Torque: | 369 NM | 337 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.8 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Equinox is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Equinox engine produces 28 HP more power than Toyota Highlander, whereas torque is 32 NM more than Toyota Highlander. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Equinox reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.8 | 12.0 | |
| Chevrolet Equinox consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Highlander, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Equinox over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 73 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 740 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Chevrolet Equinox is smaller. Chevrolet Equinox is 1 cm shorter than the Toyota Highlander, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Equinox is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 889 litres | 292 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 292 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 889 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2282 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`360 | 2`631 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Equinox has
|
| |