Chevrolet Equinox 2009 vs Toyota Highlander 2007
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 264 HP | 209 HP | |
Torque: | 301 NM | 287 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
Chevrolet Equinox engine produces 55 HP more power than Toyota Highlander, whereas torque is 14 NM more than Toyota Highlander. Despite the higher power, Chevrolet Equinox reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.8 | 9.0 | |
The Toyota Highlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Equinox consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Highlander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Equinox could require 420 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 65 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
720 km on highway | 740 km on highway | ||
Toyota Highlander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.77 m | 4.79 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.91 m | |
Height: | 1.68 m | 1.76 m | |
Chevrolet Equinox is smaller. Chevrolet Equinox is 1 cm shorter than the Toyota Highlander, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Equinox is 8 cm lower. | |||
Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
Trunk capacity: | 889 litres | 292 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 292 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 889 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2282 litres | |
Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`400 | 2`721 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Equinox has
|
Toyota Highlander has
| |