Chevrolet Equinox 2009 vs Toyota Highlander 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 264 HP | 187 HP | |
| Torque: | 301 NM | 186 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Equinox is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Equinox engine produces 77 HP more power than Toyota Highlander, whereas torque is 115 NM more than Toyota Highlander. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Equinox reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.8 | 9.8 | |
|
The Toyota Highlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Equinox consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Highlander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Equinox could require 300 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 73 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Highlander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Chevrolet Equinox is smaller. Chevrolet Equinox is 1 cm shorter than the Toyota Highlander, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Equinox is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 889 litres | 292 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 292 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 889 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2282 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`360 | 2`432 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Equinox has
|
Toyota Highlander has
| |