Chevrolet Equinox 2009 vs Volvo XC90 2011

 
Chevrolet Equinox
2009 - 2015
Volvo XC90
2011 - 2014
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.4 Petrol2.4 Diesel

Performance

Power: 182 HP163 HP
Torque: 233 NM340 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.8 seconds11.8 seconds
Chevrolet Equinox is more dynamic to drive.
Chevrolet Equinox engine produces 19 HP more power than Volvo XC90, but torque is 107 NM less than Volvo XC90. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Equinox reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.28.2
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Chevrolet Equinox consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Equinox could require 300 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 71 litres68 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 690 km in combined cycle820 km in combined cycle
870 km on highway1000 km on highway
Volvo XC90 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.77 m4.81 m
Width: 1.84 m1.94 m
Height: 1.68 m1.78 m
Chevrolet Equinox is smaller.
Chevrolet Equinox is 4 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Equinox is 10 cm lower.
Seats: 5 seats7 seats
Trunk capacity: 889 litres249 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: no data249 litres
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: 889 litres600 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1837 litres
In 5-seat version Chevrolet Equinox has more luggage space (by 289 litres).
Turning diameter: no data12.5 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`3002`680
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): no data12 000
Pros and Cons: Chevrolet Equinox has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Volvo XC90 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv