Chevrolet Equinox 2009 vs Volvo XC90 2011
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 182 HP | 163 HP | |
Torque: | 233 NM | 340 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
Chevrolet Equinox is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Equinox engine produces 19 HP more power than Volvo XC90, but torque is 107 NM less than Volvo XC90. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Equinox reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 8.2 | |
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Equinox consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Equinox could require 300 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 68 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
870 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
Volvo XC90 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.77 m | 4.81 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.94 m | |
Height: | 1.68 m | 1.78 m | |
Chevrolet Equinox is smaller. Chevrolet Equinox is 4 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Equinox is 10 cm lower. | |||
Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
Trunk capacity: | 889 litres | 249 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 249 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 889 litres | 600 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1837 litres | |
In 5-seat version Chevrolet Equinox has more luggage space (by 289 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 12.5 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`300 | 2`680 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | 12 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Equinox has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |