Chevrolet Equinox 2009 vs Toyota Highlander 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 182 HP | 187 HP | |
| Torque: | 233 NM | 186 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Toyota Highlander is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Equinox engine produces 5 HP less power than Toyota Highlander, but torque is 47 NM more than Toyota Highlander. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Equinox reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 9.8 | |
| Chevrolet Equinox consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Highlander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Equinox could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 73 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Chevrolet Equinox is smaller. Chevrolet Equinox is 1 cm shorter than the Toyota Highlander, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Equinox is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 889 litres | 292 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 292 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 889 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2282 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`300 | 2`432 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Equinox has
|
Toyota Highlander has
| |