Chevrolet Equinox 2009 vs Toyota Highlander 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 182 HP | 187 HP | |
| Torque: | 233 NM | 186 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Equinox is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Equinox engine produces 5 HP less power than Toyota Highlander, but torque is 47 NM more than Toyota Highlander. Despite less power, Chevrolet Equinox reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 9.8 | |
|
The Chevrolet Equinox is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Equinox consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Highlander, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Equinox over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 73 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| Chevrolet Equinox gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Chevrolet Equinox is smaller. Chevrolet Equinox is 1 cm shorter than the Toyota Highlander, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Equinox is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 889 litres | 292 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 292 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 889 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2282 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`127 | 2`432 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Equinox has
|
| |