Chevrolet Equinox 2008 vs Mazda CX-9 2007

 
Chevrolet Equinox
2008 - 2009
Mazda CX-9
2007 - 2009
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 3.6 Petrol3.5 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 264 HP263 HP
Torque: 339 NM339 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a secondsn/a seconds
Chevrolet Equinox engine produces 1 HP more power than Mazda CX-9, the torque is the same for both cars.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): no data12.7
Fuel tank capacity: 78 litres76 litres

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 390'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 9 years1 years
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chevrolet Equinox might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Chevrolet Equinox engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.80 m5.07 m
Width: 1.81 m1.94 m
Height: 1.76 m1.73 m
Chevrolet Equinox is smaller, but slightly higher.
Chevrolet Equinox is 28 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-9, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Equinox is 3 cm higher.
Seats: 5 seats7 seats
Trunk capacity: 860 litres487 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: no data487 litres
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: 860 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data2852 litres
Turning diameter: no datano data
Gross weight (kg): no data2`735
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): no data6400
Pros and Cons:
    Mazda CX-9 has
    • longer expected engine lifespan
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv