Chevrolet Equinox 2008 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 3.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 264 HP | 275 HP | |
| Torque: | 339 NM | 640 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Equinox engine produces 11 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, whereas torque is 301 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 11.1 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 84 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.76 m | |
| Chevrolet Equinox and Land Rover Range Rover Sport are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 860 litres | 960 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage space. Chevrolet Equinox has 100 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |