Chevrolet Equinox 2008 vs Jeep Commander 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 3.7 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 264 HP | 213 HP | |
| Torque: | 339 NM | 319 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chevrolet Equinox engine produces 51 HP more power than Jeep Commander, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Jeep Commander. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 78 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge RAM, Dodge Durango, Dodge Nitro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Commander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.83 m | |
| Chevrolet Equinox and Jeep Commander are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 860 litres | 170 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1950 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Equinox has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Equinox has 690 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Commander. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`905 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Equinox has
|
Jeep Commander has
| |