Chevrolet Equinox 2005 vs Mercedes ML 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.4 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 185 HP | 272 HP | |
| Torque: | 285 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
|
Mercedes ML is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Equinox engine produces 87 HP less power than Mercedes ML, whereas torque is 65 NM less than Mercedes ML. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Equinox reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 12.0 | |
|
The Chevrolet Equinox is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Equinox consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Equinox over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 95 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| Mercedes ML gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.82 m | |
| Chevrolet Equinox is 2 cm longer than the Mercedes ML, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Equinox is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 860 litres | 551 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Equinox has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Equinox has 309 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes ML. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`830 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Equinox has
|
Mercedes ML has
| |