Chevrolet Equinox 2005 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.4 Petrol | 3.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 185 HP | 275 HP | |
| Torque: | 285 NM | 640 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Equinox engine produces 90 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, whereas torque is 355 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Despite less power, Chevrolet Equinox reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 11.1 | |
| Chevrolet Equinox consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Equinox over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 84 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.76 m | |
| Chevrolet Equinox and Land Rover Range Rover Sport are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 860 litres | 960 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage space. Chevrolet Equinox has 100 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |