Chevrolet Equinox 2005 vs Infiniti FX 2003
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.4 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 185 HP | 280 HP | |
Torque: | 285 NM | 366 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 7.1 seconds | |
Infiniti FX is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Equinox engine produces 95 HP less power than Infiniti FX, whereas torque is 81 NM less than Infiniti FX. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Equinox reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 12.7 | |
The Chevrolet Equinox is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Equinox consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Infiniti FX, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Equinox over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 90 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
700 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
Infiniti FX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.80 m | 4.81 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.93 m | |
Height: | 1.76 m | 1.65 m | |
Chevrolet Equinox is smaller, but higher. Chevrolet Equinox and Infiniti FX are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 860 litres | 776 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1826 litres | |
Chevrolet Equinox has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Equinox has 84 litres more trunk space than the Infiniti FX. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`430 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | 4800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Equinox has
|
Infiniti FX has
| |