Chevrolet Equinox 2005 vs BMW X5 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.4 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 185 HP | 272 HP | |
| Torque: | 285 NM | 315 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
|
BMW X5 is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Equinox engine produces 87 HP less power than BMW X5, whereas torque is 30 NM less than BMW X5. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Equinox reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 10.2 | |
|
The BMW X5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Equinox consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Equinox could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 85 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| BMW X5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| BMW X5 2007 3.0 engine: The BMW N52 engine was the first water-cooled engine to feature a composite cylinder block made from a magnesium and aluminum alloy. It was included in Ward’s AutoWorld’s list of the top 10 engines in 2006 and 2007. While it offers many advantages, the ... More about BMW X5 2007 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.77 m | |
|
Chevrolet Equinox is smaller. Chevrolet Equinox is 5 cm shorter than the BMW X5, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Equinox is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 860 litres | 620 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1750 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Equinox has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Chevrolet Equinox has 240 litres more trunk space than the BMW X5. The BMW X5 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 13 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`680 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Equinox has
|
BMW X5 has
| |