Chevrolet Equinox 2005 vs Infiniti FX 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.4 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 185 HP | 280 HP | |
| Torque: | 285 NM | 366 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 7.1 seconds | |
|
Infiniti FX is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Equinox engine produces 95 HP less power than Infiniti FX, whereas torque is 81 NM less than Infiniti FX. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Equinox reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 12.1 | |
|
The Chevrolet Equinox is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Equinox consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Infiniti FX, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Equinox over 15,000 km in a year you can save 315 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| Infiniti FX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Chevrolet Equinox) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Infiniti FX) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Chevrolet Equinox is smaller, but higher. Chevrolet Equinox and Infiniti FX are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 860 litres | 776 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1826 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Equinox has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Equinox has 84 litres more trunk space than the Infiniti FX. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`340 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Equinox has
|
Infiniti FX has
| |