Chevrolet Equinox 2017 vs BMW 5 series 1995
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Chevrolet Equinox is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas BMW 5 series has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Chevrolet Equinox is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while BMW 5 series can be equipped only with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 | 2.0 - 4.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 139 - 256 HP | 115 - 286 HP | |
| Torque: | 275 - 353 NM | 190 - 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.2 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 - 9.6 | 5.9 - 12.2 | |
|
Chevrolet Equinox petrol engines consumes on average 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than BMW 5 series. On average, Chevrolet Equinox equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.44 m | |
| Chevrolet Equinox is 13 cm shorter than the BMW 5 series, 4 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Equinox is 22 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 847 litres | 460 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1798 litres | no data | |
|
Chevrolet Equinox has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The BMW 5 series may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Equinox is 0.4 metres more than that of the BMW 5 series, which means Chevrolet Equinox can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | ~ 2`077 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Equinox has
|
BMW 5 sērija has
| |