Chevrolet Equinox 2017 vs Chrysler LHS 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Chevrolet Equinox is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Chrysler LHS can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 3.5 (petrol) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Chevrolet Equinox is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 139 - 256 HP | 218 - 257 HP | |
| Torque: | 275 - 353 NM | 300 - 348 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 - 9.6 | 10.9 - 11.3 | |
|
Chevrolet Equinox petrol engines consumes on average 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chrysler LHS. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 5.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Chevrolet Equinox is smaller, but higher. Chevrolet Equinox is 62 cm shorter than the Chrysler LHS, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Equinox is 24 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 847 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1798 litres | no data | |
|
Chevrolet Equinox has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Chevrolet Equinox has 317 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler LHS. The Chrysler LHS may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Equinox has
|
Chrysler LHS has
| |