Chevrolet Equinox 2017 vs BMW X5 2018
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Chevrolet Equinox is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while BMW X5 can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Chevrolet Equinox also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 2.0 - 4.4 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and diesel engines. BMW X5 is available also with hybrid engines. Hybrid engines offer superior fuel efficiency and reduced emissions compared to conventional engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 139 - 256 HP | 231 - 462 HP | |
| Torque: | 275 - 353 NM | 450 - 760 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 4.7 - 7.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 - 9.6 | 6.8 - 11.6 | |
|
Chevrolet Equinox petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than BMW X5. On average, Chevrolet Equinox equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 4.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Chevrolet Equinox is smaller. Chevrolet Equinox is 27 cm shorter than the BMW X5, 16 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Equinox is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 847 litres | 650 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1798 litres | 1870 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Chevrolet Equinox has 197 litres more trunk space than the BMW X5. The BMW X5 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X5 (by 72 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Equinox is 1.2 metres less than that of the BMW X5, which means Chevrolet Equinox can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`962 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 53 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Equinox has
|
BMW X5 has
| |