Chevrolet Equinox 2009 vs Chevrolet Trax 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chevrolet Equinox is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Chevrolet Trax has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 2.4 - 3.6 (petrol) | 1.4 - 1.7 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 182 - 301 HP | 115 - 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 233 - 369 NM | 155 - 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.8 - 10.8 seconds | 9.6 - 12.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 - 12.4 | 4.5 - 6.5 | |
|
Chevrolet Equinox petrol engines consumes on average 4.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Trax. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Chevrolet Equinox is larger. Chevrolet Equinox is 52 cm longer than the Chevrolet Trax, 7 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Equinox is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 889 litres | 356 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Equinox has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Equinox has 533 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Trax. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`325 | ~ 1`863 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Equinox has
|
Chevrolet Trax has
| |