Chevrolet Equinox 2005 vs Nissan Murano 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 3.4 - 3.6 (petrol) | 2.5 - 3.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Both cars are available with petrol engines. Nissan Murano is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 185 - 264 HP | 190 - 256 HP | |
Torque: | 285 - 339 NM | 334 - 450 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 8 - 10.5 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 - 11.0 | 8.0 - 10.9 | |
Chevrolet Equinox petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Nissan Murano. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.80 m | 4.83 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.88 m | |
Height: | 1.76 m | 1.73 m | |
Chevrolet Equinox is smaller, but slightly higher. Chevrolet Equinox is 4 cm shorter than the Nissan Murano, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Equinox is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 860 litres | 402 litres | |
Chevrolet Equinox has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Chevrolet Equinox has 458 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Murano. The Nissan Murano may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`326 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | 4200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Equinox has
|
Nissan Murano has
| |