Chevrolet Epica 2007 vs Volvo S80 2006
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 163 HP | |
Torque: | 320 NM | 340 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 10 seconds | |
Chevrolet Epica engine produces 13 HP less power than Volvo S80, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Volvo S80. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Epica reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 7.2 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
The Volvo S80 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Epica consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Epica could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Epica consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
800 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
Volvo S80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.80 m | 4.85 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.86 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.49 m | |
Chevrolet Epica is smaller. Chevrolet Epica is 5 cm shorter than the Volvo S80, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Epica is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 480 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Chevrolet Epica is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volvo S80. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`200 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 2400 | 4400 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.5/10 | 8.8/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Epica has
|
Volvo S80 has
| |