Chevrolet Epica 2007 vs Volvo S80 2006

 
Chevrolet Epica
2007 - 2010
Volvo S80
2006 - 2009
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.4 Diesel

Performance

Power: 150 HP163 HP
Torque: 320 NM340 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.1 seconds10 seconds
Chevrolet Epica engine produces 13 HP less power than Volvo S80, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Volvo S80. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Epica reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.67.2
Real fuel consumption: 8.1 l/100km7.3 l/100km
The Volvo S80 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Chevrolet Epica consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Epica could require 60 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Epica consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80.
Fuel tank capacity: 65 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 850 km in combined cycle970 km in combined cycle
800 km with real consumption950 km with real consumption
Volvo S80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.80 m4.85 m
Width: 1.81 m1.86 m
Height: 1.45 m1.49 m
Chevrolet Epica is smaller.
Chevrolet Epica is 5 cm shorter than the Volvo S80, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Epica is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 480 litres480 litres
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Chevrolet Epica is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volvo S80.
Gross weight (kg): no data2`200
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 24004400
Rating in user reviews: 8.5/10 8.8/10
Pros and Cons: Chevrolet Epica has
  • lower price
Volvo S80 has
  • more power
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv