Chevrolet Epica 2007 vs SAAB 9-3 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Epica is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Epica engine produces 25 HP more power than SAAB 9-3, whereas torque is 40 NM more than SAAB 9-3. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Epica reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
The Chevrolet Epica is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Epica consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-3, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Epica over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Epica consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Chevrolet Epica gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Chevrolet Epica is larger, but slightly lower. Chevrolet Epica is 16 cm longer than the SAAB 9-3, 5 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Epica is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 1600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.5/10 | 7.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Epica has
|
SAAB 9-3 has
| |