Chevrolet Epica 2006 vs Toyota Camry 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 141 HP | 179 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 NM | 232 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chevrolet Epica engine produces 38 HP less power than Toyota Camry, whereas torque is 37 NM less than Toyota Camry. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 9.0 | |
|
The Chevrolet Epica is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Epica consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Camry, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Epica over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota Camry engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota RAV4, Lexus ES | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Camry might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota Camry 2009 2.5 engine: The 2.5-liter 2AR-FE engine replaced the earlier 2.4-liter AZ series and is widely regarded as a highly reliable, long-lasting engine, often referred to as a "million-kms" motor. However, it requires ... More about Toyota Camry 2009 2.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Epica is 2 cm shorter than the Toyota Camry, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Epica is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 410 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Epica has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Chevrolet Epica has 70 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Camry. The Toyota Camry may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Epica is 0.2 metres less than that of the Toyota Camry. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`985 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Epica has
|
Toyota Camry has
| |