Chevrolet Epica 2006 vs SAAB 9-3 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 1.8 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 141 - 156 HP | 120 - 210 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 - 320 NM | 167 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 - 10.1 seconds | 7.5 - 11.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 - 9.3 | 5.8 - 9.5 | |
|
On average, the Chevrolet Epica petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as SAAB 9-3. On average, Chevrolet Epica equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Chevrolet Epica is larger, but slightly lower. Chevrolet Epica is 16 cm longer than the SAAB 9-3, 5 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Epica is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`985 | ~ 1`577 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 1400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.5/10 | 7.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Epica has
|
SAAB 9-3 has
| |