Chevrolet Epica 2006 vs Audi A4 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Chevrolet Epica is available only with front wheel drive, while Audi A4 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 1.6 - 2.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 141 - 156 HP | 90 - 193 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 - 320 NM | 140 - 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 - 10.1 seconds | 7.2 - 14.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 - 9.3 | 5.3 - 10.9 | |
|
Chevrolet Epica petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Audi A4. On average, Chevrolet Epica equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A4. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Chevrolet Epica is larger. Chevrolet Epica is 32 cm longer than the Audi A4, 8 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Epica is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 440 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Epica has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Epica has 40 litres more trunk space than the Audi A4. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Epica is 0.3 metres less than that of the Audi A4. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`985 | ~ 1`895 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 1400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.5/10 | 7.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Epica has
|
Audi A4 has
| |