Chevrolet Epica 2006 vs Chevrolet Cruze 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 141 - 156 HP | 109 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 - 320 NM | 150 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 - 10.1 seconds | 10 - 13.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 - 9.3 | 5.8 - 8.3 | |
|
Chevrolet Epica petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Cruze. On average, Chevrolet Epica equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Cruze. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Chevrolet Epica is larger, but lower. Chevrolet Epica is 20 cm longer than the Chevrolet Cruze, 2 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Epica is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 450 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Epica has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Epica has 30 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Cruze. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Epica is 0.1 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Cruze. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`985 | ~ 1`828 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Epica has
|
Chevrolet Cruze has
| |