Chevrolet Cruze 2009 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 2007
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 140 HP | |
Torque: | 320 NM | 310 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
Chevrolet Cruze engine produces 10 HP more power than Mitsubishi Lancer, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Mitsubishi Lancer. Despite the higher power, Chevrolet Cruze reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 6.1 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
The Mitsubishi Lancer is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Chevrolet Cruze consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Cruze over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Chevrolet Cruze consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 59 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
1250 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
880 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.60 m | 4.57 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.49 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Cruze is 3 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Lancer, 3 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Cruze is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 400 litres | |
Chevrolet Cruze has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Cruze has 50 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Lancer. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 10 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`930 | 1`920 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | no data | |
Average price (€): | 3600 | 2400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Cruze has
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has
| |