Chevrolet Cruze 2009 vs Mercedes C class 2011
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.1 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 120 HP | |
Torque: | 320 NM | 300 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
Chevrolet Cruze is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Cruze engine produces 30 HP more power than Mercedes C class, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Mercedes C class. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Cruze reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 4.9 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
The Mercedes C class is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Cruze consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Cruze could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Cruze consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 59 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 1200 km in combined cycle | |
1250 km on highway | 1370 km on highway | ||
880 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
Mercedes C class gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Front-wheel drive cars (Chevrolet Cruze) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes C class) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 530'000 km | 390'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chevrolet Cruze engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 5 years | 14 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chevrolet Captiva, Opel Antara, Chevrolet Epica | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Mercedes E klase, Mercedes A klase, Mercedes Vito | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes C class might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.60 m | 4.59 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.43 m | |
Chevrolet Cruze is larger. Chevrolet Cruze and Mercedes C class are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 475 litres | |
Mercedes C class has more luggage space. Chevrolet Cruze has 25 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes C class. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`930 | 2`105 | |
Safety: | |||
Chevrolet Cruze is better rated in child safety tests. The Mercedes C class scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | low | above average | |
Mercedes C class has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Cruze has serious deffects in 145 percent more cases than Mercedes C class, so Mercedes C class quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 4000 | 9000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Cruze has
|
Mercedes C klase has
| |