Chevrolet Cruze 2009 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 2008
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 109 HP | 143 HP | |
Torque: | 150 NM | 178 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
Mitsubishi Lancer is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Cruze engine produces 34 HP less power than Mitsubishi Lancer, whereas torque is 28 NM less than Mitsubishi Lancer. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Cruze reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 7.7 | |
The Chevrolet Cruze is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Cruze consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Cruze over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 59 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
Chevrolet Cruze gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 11 years | 10 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chevrolet Aveo, Chevrolet Lacetti, Chevrolet Nubira | Used also on Mitsubishi ASX | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chevrolet Cruze might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Chevrolet Cruze engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Chevrolet Cruze 2009 1.6 engine: Durable, easy to repair, long-lasting engine, not very demanding on fuel quality.
Engine often leaks oil, which tends to cause other problems. The EGR valve can also cause problems, and many users choose to ... More about Chevrolet Cruze 2009 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.60 m | 4.57 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.49 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Cruze is 3 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Lancer, 3 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Cruze is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 400 litres | |
Chevrolet Cruze has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Cruze has 50 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Lancer. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 10 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`788 | 1`850 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | no data | |
Average price (€): | 3200 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Cruze has
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has
| |