Chevrolet Cruze 2012 vs Volvo S60 2013
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 141 HP | 245 HP | |
Torque: | 176 NM | 350 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 6.3 seconds | |
Volvo S60 is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Cruze engine produces 104 HP less power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 174 NM less than Volvo S60. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Cruze reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 6.0 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
The Volvo S60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Cruze consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Cruze could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Cruze consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 67 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
770 km with real consumption | 1030 km with real consumption | ||
Volvo S60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.60 m | 4.63 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.87 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
Chevrolet Cruze is smaller. Chevrolet Cruze is 3 cm shorter than the Volvo S60, 8 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 380 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1749 litres | |
Chevrolet Cruze has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Chevrolet Cruze has 70 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60. The Volvo S60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.3 meters | |
The turning circle of the Chevrolet Cruze is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volvo S60, which means Chevrolet Cruze can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`793 | 2`070 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | above average | |
Volvo S60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Cruze has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Volvo S60, so Volvo S60 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 4600 | 11 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Cruze has
|
Volvo S60 has
| |