Chevrolet Cruze 2012 vs Nissan Tiida 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 141 HP | 126 HP | |
| Torque: | 176 NM | 173 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Cruze is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Cruze engine produces 15 HP more power than Nissan Tiida, whereas torque is 3 NM more than Nissan Tiida. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Cruze reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 7.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Chevrolet Cruze is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Cruze consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Tiida, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Cruze over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Cruze consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Tiida. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Chevrolet Cruze gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chevrolet Cruze engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Chevrolet Orlando | Used also on Nissan Cube | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Tiida might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.53 m | |
|
Chevrolet Cruze is larger, but lower. Chevrolet Cruze is 12 cm longer than the Nissan Tiida, 9 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Cruze is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 467 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 467 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Cruze has 17 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Tiida. This could mean that the Chevrolet Cruze uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Cruze is 0.5 metres more than that of the Nissan Tiida, which means Chevrolet Cruze can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`793 | 1`735 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Cruze has
|
Nissan Tiida has
| |