Chevrolet Cruze 2011 vs Hyundai i30 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 141 HP | 126 HP | |
| Torque: | 176 NM | 157 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Cruze is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Cruze engine produces 15 HP more power than Hyundai i30, whereas torque is 19 NM more than Hyundai i30. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Cruze reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai i30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Cruze consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i30, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Cruze could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Cruze consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i30. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chevrolet Cruze engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Chevrolet Orlando | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Kia Ceed, Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai i30 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hyundai i30 2011 1.6 engine: Overall, the engine is reliable and not very demanding on fuel quality. Fuel injectors tend to be noisy. Timing chain resource is relatively low. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Chevrolet Cruze is larger, but slightly lower. Chevrolet Cruze is 23 cm longer than the Hyundai i30, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 419 litres | 340 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1250 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Cruze has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Cruze has 79 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai i30. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Cruze is 0.7 metres more than that of the Hyundai i30, which means Chevrolet Cruze can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`823 | 1`720 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Hyundai i30 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Cruze has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Hyundai i30, so Hyundai i30 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Cruze has
|
Hyundai i30 has
| |