Chevrolet Cruze 2012 vs Skoda Rapid 2012
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 141 HP | 105 HP | |
Torque: | 176 NM | 250 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
Chevrolet Cruze is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Cruze engine produces 36 HP more power than Skoda Rapid, but torque is 74 NM less than Skoda Rapid. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Cruze reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 4.3 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 5.2 l/100km | |
The Skoda Rapid is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Cruze consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Rapid, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Cruze could require 345 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Cruze consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Rapid. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 1270 km in combined cycle | |
770 km with real consumption | 1050 km with real consumption | ||
Skoda Rapid gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.51 m | 4.48 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.71 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.46 m | |
Chevrolet Cruze is larger. Chevrolet Cruze is 3 cm longer than the Skoda Rapid, 9 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Cruze is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 413 litres | 550 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1490 litres | |
Skoda Rapid has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Cruze has 137 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Rapid. This could mean that the Chevrolet Cruze uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Chevrolet Cruze is 0.3 metres more than that of the Skoda Rapid. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`823 | 1`725 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | below average | |
Average price (€): | 6200 | 6200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Cruze has
|
Skoda Rapid has
| |