Chevrolet Cruze 2012 vs Skoda Rapid 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.5 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Skoda Rapid is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Cruze engine produces 13 HP less power than Skoda Rapid, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Skoda Rapid. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Cruze reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 5.8 | |
|
The Skoda Rapid is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Cruze consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Rapid, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Cruze could require 375 litres more fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Skoda Rapid 2012 1.4 engine: The engine is prone to increased vibration at idle. The engine is also very demanding on fuel quality. The timing chain has a low life expectancy and must be monitored. Turbine problems are also common. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Chevrolet Cruze is larger. Chevrolet Cruze is 3 cm longer than the Skoda Rapid, 9 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Cruze is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 413 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1490 litres | |
|
Skoda Rapid has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Cruze has 137 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Rapid. This could mean that the Chevrolet Cruze uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Cruze is 0.7 metres more than that of the Skoda Rapid, which means Chevrolet Cruze can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`828 | 1`690 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Skoda Rapid has
| |