Chevrolet Cruze 2012 vs Mazda 3 2011

 
Chevrolet Cruze
2012 - 2015
Mazda 3
2011 - 2013
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 109 HP105 HP
Torque: 150 NM145 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.5 seconds13.1 seconds
Chevrolet Cruze engine produces 4 HP more power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 5 NM more than Mazda 3. Despite the higher power, Chevrolet Cruze reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.37.6
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Chevrolet Cruze consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Cruze could require 105 litres more fuel.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.51 m4.46 m
Width: 1.80 m1.76 m
Height: 1.48 m1.47 m
Chevrolet Cruze is larger.
Chevrolet Cruze is 5 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 413 litres340 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1360 litres
Chevrolet Cruze has more luggage capacity.
Chevrolet Cruze has 73 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3.
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Chevrolet Cruze is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Chevrolet Cruze can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8281`790
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

high
Mazda 3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Cruze has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 62005000
Pros and Cons: Chevrolet Cruze has
  • roomier boot
Mazda 3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv