Chevrolet Cruze 2015 vs Nissan Pulsar 2014
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.4 (petrol) | 1.2 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | |
Both cars are available with petrol engines. Nissan Pulsar is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 155 HP | 110 - 190 HP | |
Torque: | 240 NM | 165 - 260 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.7 - 12.7 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 - 7.4 | 3.6 - 5.1 | |
Chevrolet Cruze petrol engines consumes on average 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan Pulsar. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.45 m | 4.39 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.47 m | 1.52 m | |
Chevrolet Cruze is larger, but lower. Chevrolet Cruze is 7 cm longer than the Nissan Pulsar, 2 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Cruze is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 700 litres | 385 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1395 litres | |
Chevrolet Cruze has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Cruze has 315 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Pulsar. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 10.2 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`324 | ~ 1`768 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | average | |
Average price (€): | no data | 7200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Cruze has
|
Nissan Pulsar has
| |