Chevrolet Cruze 2009 vs Chevrolet Epica 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 109 - 150 HP | 141 - 156 HP | |
Torque: | 150 - 320 NM | 195 - 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 - 13.5 seconds | 9.7 - 10.1 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 - 8.3 | 6.1 - 9.3 | |
Chevrolet Cruze petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Epica. On average, Chevrolet Cruze equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Epica. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.60 m | 4.80 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.51 m | 1.45 m | |
Chevrolet Cruze is smaller, but higher. Chevrolet Cruze is 20 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Epica, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Cruze is 6 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 480 litres | |
Chevrolet Epica has more luggage space. Chevrolet Cruze has 30 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Epica. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Chevrolet Cruze is 0.1 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Epica. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`828 | ~ 1`985 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | no data | |
Average price (€): | 3600 | 2400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Cruze has
|
Chevrolet Epica has
| |