Chevrolet Cruze 2011 vs Kia Ceed 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 - 163 HP | 90 - 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 - 360 NM | 137 - 255 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 13.5 seconds | 10.4 - 14.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 - 8.3 | 4.4 - 7.6 | |
|
Chevrolet Cruze petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Kia Ceed. On average, Chevrolet Cruze equipped with diesel engines consume 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
| Chevrolet Cruze is 28 cm longer than the Kia Ceed, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 340 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Cruze has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Cruze has 110 litres more trunk space than the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Cruze is 0.6 metres more than that of the Kia Ceed, which means Chevrolet Cruze can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`874 | ~ 1`803 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Cruze has
|
Kia Ceed has
| |