Chevrolet Cruze 2012 vs Chevrolet Cruze 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
---|---|---|---|
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Engines: | 1.4 - 1.8 (petrol) | 1.6 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 109 - 141 HP | 109 - 150 HP | |
Torque: | 150 - 200 NM | 150 - 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 - 13.5 seconds | 10 - 13.5 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 8.3 | 5.8 - 8.3 | |
Chevrolet Cruze 2012 petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Cruze 2009. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.51 m | 4.60 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.51 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Cruze 2012 is 9 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Cruze 2009, width is practically the same , while the height of Chevrolet Cruze 2012 is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 413 litres | 450 litres | |
Chevrolet Cruze 2009 has more luggage space. Chevrolet Cruze 2012 has 37 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Cruze 2009. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`834 | ~ 1`828 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | low | |
Average price (€): | 6200 | 3600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Cruze has
|
Chevrolet Cruze has
| |