Chevrolet Colorado 2006 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.9 Petrol | 2.4 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 189 HP | 181 HP | |
| Torque: | 258 NM | 430 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chevrolet Colorado engine produces 8 HP more power than Mitsubishi L 200, but torque is 172 NM less than Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.5 | 8.6 | |
|
The Mitsubishi L 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Colorado consumes 3.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Colorado could require 585 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 74 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi L 200 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 530'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chevrolet Colorado engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 10 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi L 200 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Chevrolet Colorado engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.26 m | 5.23 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.80 m | |
| Chevrolet Colorado is 4 cm longer than the Mitsubishi L 200, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Colorado is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 645 litres | 1061 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Colorado has 416 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi L 200. This could mean that the Chevrolet Colorado uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 30 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Colorado has
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |