Chevrolet Colorado 2004 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 314 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 14.6 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Colorado engine produces 41 HP more power than Mitsubishi L 200, but torque is 64 NM less than Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.3 | 9.5 | |
|
The Mitsubishi L 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Colorado consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Colorado could require 270 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi L 200 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.26 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.78 m | |
| Chevrolet Colorado is 19 cm longer than the Mitsubishi L 200, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Colorado is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 645 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8800 | 8600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Colorado has
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |